GxP Lifeline, February 2012
With the goal of optimizing collaborations in the drug development industry, Nice Insight developed a quarterly survey to measure customer awareness and customer perception across 300+ contract research and manufacturers.
Nice Insight's Q4 Pharmaceutical and Biotechnology Outsourcing Survey generated responses from 2,619 outsourcing-facing executives from big pharma (29%), specialty pharma (17%), emerging/niche/start-up pharma (22%), biotechnology (25%), and emerging biotechnology (7%). In addition to creating a research tool that aids sponsors in the outsourcing partner selection process and enabling CROs and CMOs to understand their position within the industry, Nice Insight also garners broad industry trends from its survey data.
Results from Nice Insight's Q4 survey indicate that the top five services outsourced by pharmaceutical and biotech companies vary between different customer segments within the industry. For example, hiring consultants was reported as the most frequently outsourced service overall and across every segment with the exception of emerging biotech (where it ranked third). As consultants may be engaged for myriad reasons, the tables and this article include the top five services for each customer segment in addition to consulting.
Almost one half (48%) of survey respondents indicated their business would hire consultants in 2012. In looking at the overall data, it appears that 40% of the industry intends to outsource pharmaceutical analytical testing in the current year. This service is predominately sought out in established markets, with 69% of those who will outsource analytical testing reporting a preference for companies in this market segment. However, one quarter of respondents indicated that market alone was not a factor when selecting a CRO or CMO for analytical services.
Clinical research rounded out the top three most frequently outsourced services, with 38% of respondents indicating they would outsource this service in 2012. While the majority, at 60%, indicated they would partner with a business in an established market, almost one fifth of respondents reported they look to emerging markets when recruiting CROs. With 19% of respondents who subcontract clinical research indicating emerging markets are preferred for this service, it is the second most popular project type to send overseas.
One third of the respondents indicated their business would outsource bio-analytical testing. Much like traditional small-molecule analysis, biologics or large-molecule testing is often sought among providers in established markets, sixty-three percent of respondents who will subcontract bio-analytical testing in 2012 indicated a preference for providers in established markets, while only 16% of respondents would choose providers in emerging markets for this service. Chemical synthesis and external regulatory support were both outsourced by 24% of respondents, making these services (tied for) the fifth most frequently outsourced services for 2012. However, chemical synthesis received the highest percentage (27%) of respondents who would look to providers in emerging markets, with only 51% indicating they would seek providers in established markets. Twenty-two percent of respondents indicated that market is not a factor when selecting a chemical synthesis provider. Conversely, when engaging regulatory support, only 13% of respondents reported they look to providers in emerging markets. Sixty-two percent of respondents indicated they prefer regulatory support providers in established markets and market was not a factor for 25%.
It was interesting to observe preferences among respondents with respect to market and services. For example, when looking at the industry overall, there was a notable preference for outsourcing to established markets that ranged from 51% for chemical synthesis to 69% for analytical testing. Yet, when respondents were asked to indicate the percentage of their outsourcing that corresponds to each region, 47% was allocated to established markets, 36% to the U. S. and Canada and 11% to Western Europe. China (17%) and India (11%) comprised the bulk of outsourcing to emerging markets. South America and Eastern Europe followed with nine and seven percent respectively, while the Middle East, Korea and Thailand currently receive two to three percent of projects. This suggests that while there is a preference for established providers, other factors also influence partnership decisions.
In looking at the overall data, it appears that 40% of the industry intends to outsource pharmaceutical analytical testing in the current year.
When comparing the outsourcing behaviors of pharma companies to biotech/biologics companies, observable differences emerge. Within the three pharma segments (big, specialty, and emerging/niche/start-up)the data showed that five of the top six outsourced services were the same, with some variance in ranking. Four of these services overlapped with the outsourcing needs of biotech/biologics companies. As was previously mentioned, consulting services ranked highest overall and as number one across each of these segments, excluding emerging biotech companies. Clinical research, analytical testing and bio-analytical testing rounded out the top four across all customer groups. However, pharma segments frequently outsourced regulatory support, whereas biologics segments were more likely to outsource chemical synthesis.
Not surprisingly, big pharma companies tended to exhibit less preference for established market providers and were more likely to indicate that market was not a factor in the partner selection process. That being said, big pharma still allocated the almost half (45%) of their outsourcing to businesses in the U.S., Canada and Western Europe. Also, just less than one third of big pharma’s outsourcing was completed in China (17%) and India (14%) combined. Thirty-five percent of big pharma respondents indicated they would outsource clinical research in 2012, and despite the benefits of conducting clinical trials in emerging markets, almost half (49%) of these respondents still indicated a preference for CROs in established markets. This may be attributed to the fact that the 51% of big pharma respondents who have outsourced clinical trials to emerging markets encountered added complications due to language barriers.
Big pharma respondents were also very likely to outsource analytical testing services (33%) and showed a strong preference to providers in established markets (57%). However, as a whole, this customer segment was more likely to state that “market was not a factor” in selecting an outsourcing partner than each of the other groups. As such, 29% were not concerned about market when choosing a CRO or CMO for analytical projects. The big pharma customer segments’ top services outsourced differed from the other pharma customer groups with respect to drug delivery systems. For example, one quarter of big pharma respondents indicated they would outsource drug delivery in 2012, which was considerably higher than the Specialty Pharma (16%) and Emerging Pharma (12%) customer segments.
Specialty pharma respondents showed the strongest preference for contractors from established markets among the three segments of pharma customers. Of their top outsourced services, established markets were preferred 66% of the time for clinical research and regulatory support and 77% of the time for analytical testing. Clinical research and analytical testing were also the most frequently outsourced services at 37%, and 34% respectively, after consulting, at 42%. Bio-analytical testing (25%) and regulatory support (21%) and fill & finish (19%) comprised the remainder of the top positions. With approximately one in five Specialty Pharma respondents indicating they would outsource fill & finish in 2012, this service was uniquely popular among this customer segment.
Understandably, emerging/niche/start-up pharma companies tend to subcontract fewer services on an annual basis, which “adds up” to approximately three, compared to Specialty Pharma’s four and Big Pharma’s five unique services per year. Consequently, the top six services outsourced received lower percentages from Emerging Pharma than the specialty and big pharma segments. For this customer group, analytical testing (24%) was outsourced at a greater frequency than clinical research (18%), highlighting another way in which the emerging pharma companies differ from Specialty and Big Pharma companies (where clinical research was outsourced with greater frequency than analytical testing or bio-analytical testing).
Emerging pharma companies also reported the greatest preference for clinical research providers in established markets at 71%. This is likely correlated with language challenges reported by more than half (54%) of respondents who previously used an emerging market provider for clinical research. Across all of the customer segments, Emerging Pharma companies were the most likely to outsource to businesses in established markets. Among Emerging Pharma companies, 45% of projects were allocated to businesses in the U.S. and Canada and 8% to businesses in Western Europe.
Biotech and emerging biotech companies also exhibited differences in outsourcing behavior when compared to the three pharmaceutical segments. The key difference being that pharma companies tended to outsource regulatory support as one of their top services, whereas biologics companies more commonly outsourced chemical synthesis. This data is useful for contract service providers that are looking to develop new chemical synthesis business as their focus would be better served with the biologics segments of the drug development industry.
Four of the top six services outsourced among biotech companies closely mirrored those of big pharma and the industry overall, with the key difference lying in where clinical research appeared in the top four. Among biotech companies, clinical research appeared fourth at 30% after consulting (38%), analytical testing (37%) and bio-analytical testing (32%). Amongst big pharma respondents, clinical research appeared second followed by analytical testing and bio-analytical testing. Chemical synthesis (22%) and fill & finish (20%) projects filled out the top six services outsourced by Biotech companies.
Like the other customer segments, biotech/biologics companies showed a preference for businesses in established markets, especially among consultants (65% vs. 12% for emerging markets) and analytical testing providers (68% vs. 11%, respectively). It is also worth noting that approximately one in five respondents within the biotech customer group indicated that “market was not a factor” in selecting an outsourcing partner for the most frequently outsourced services. When it came to the actual allocation of outsourced projects/budget by region, biotech companies allocated a higher percentage to the U.S. and Canada (38% vs. 29%) and Western Europe (11% vs. 8%) than their emerging biotech counterparts. As a matter of fact, 63% of emerging biotech projects were outsourced to emerging markets compared to 51% of Biotech projects.
China was the most popular source for partners from emerging markets among respondents from emerging biotech companies, completing 17% of their business. This segment also reported a greater percentage of their annual outsourcing to Argentina and Brazil (15%) and Eastern Europe (10%) than any other customer segment. When asked about outsourcing planned for 2012, 40% of respondents from Emerging Biotech reported their businesses would outsource bio-analytical testing. Clinical research (39%) and consulting (37%) and analytical testing (34%) were not far behind. Thirty-two percent of emerging biotech respondents reported they will outsource chemical synthesis in 2012. Custom manufacturing was the sixth most popular service outsourced among this group, with one-quarter of emerging biotech respondents indicating their company would engage a CMO.
While emerging biotech companies reported a preference for businesses in established markets for partnering on bio-analytical testing, one in five respondents partnered with a company in an emerging market for this service. Only seven percent mentioned market was not a factor in selecting a bio-analytical testing provider. Interestingly, 92% of respondents from emerging biotech companies reported they partner with a contractor in an established market for pharmaceutical analytical testing. Furthermore, only eight percent had partners in emerging markets and none of the respondents reported that market didn't factor into selecting an analytical testing partner. Considering the emerging biotech segment outsources as many different services annually as big pharma (4.8 vs. 5), the amount of outsourcing this segment sends to emerging markets (approximately 63%), and their opinions on how market factors into partner selection, this customer segment may be able to provide useful insight into which services to outsource to emerging markets as well as which emerging market provides the best fit for each service.